With Malta blazing the trail this month and passing new legislation regulating ICOs, exchanges, and DLT, the crypto community has been somewhat divided. Regulation–for the most part–seems to be welcomed. After all, the majority of ICO teams are legitimate and don’t want to scam their investors out of funds or end up behind bars.
But the argument about regulation stifling innovation is still a valid concern.
While the US gears up for Security Token Offerings (STOs) and Germany prepares to hold Equity Token Offerings (ETOs), some very important questions still remain:
Are we being too quick to apply regulation to such a young technology? Is there another way to protect investors and founders without putting everything into a box? According to regulators in Switzerland, there is. And it’s called ‘principle-based’ law.
Regulatory Arbitrage or Principle-Based Law?
The Swiss approach to ICO regulation is not without its critics. In fact, some jurisdictions accuse them of basically regulatory arbitrage, rather than principle-based law. Regulatory arbitrage is basically the practice of capitalizing on loopholes in regulatory systems so as to circumvent unfavorable regulation.
In other words? Dodging the security bullet. And there’s an ongoing debate in the legal field in general about the merits of principle-based regulatory systems versus rule-based ones. But, in the case of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies at least, what principle-based law does is give regulators more flexibility. And that may be a good thing for innovation.
Of course, the Swiss are famous for cashing in on loopholes and providing fiscal leniency. But when an area is so category-breaking, principle-based law allows for much-needed breathing space. Malta argues that we need new laws for new situations that have never happened before, while Switzerland applies a more pragmatic approach. Neutral is probably the main word here.
Olga Feldmeier, CEO of Swiss-based tokenized alternative asset marketplace Smart Valor says, “How can you write such detailed, prescriptive regulations in such a new space? This would kill innovation.” And maybe she has a point. Heading up regulation in Switzerland’s Crypto Valley, she earned the title of “Bitcoin Queen.”
So, while the Swiss system and their principles raise some skepticism for loopholes, and the Germans like to do things by the rule book, one thing is abundantly clear. There are a lot of differences of opinion when it comes to regulation and it will be interesting to see which countries end up getting it right.
Please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. CryptoMode is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.