The influence of cryptocurrencies on terrorist financing has surfaced as a compelling narrative. This notion gained traction when The Wall Street Journal published a piece shedding light on how militant groups like Hamas allegedly fueled their operations using crypto. However, a closer inspection reveals a more nuanced narrative than initially presented.
Dissecting the Original Crypto Narrative
On October 10, a piece headlined “Hamas Militants Behind Israel Attack Raised Millions in Crypto” emerged on WSJ’s platform. Insights from blockchain analytics firm Elliptic back the article. It posits that the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), an extremist faction operating within the Gaza enclave, amassed a staggering $93 million from August 2021 to June 2023.
The narrative stemmed from an Elliptic report stating the interception of PIJ-associated crypto wallets by Israeli counter-terrorism forces. Those actions account for $93 million during the specified period. However, a crucial detail was overlooked. Elliptic had not asserted that these funds were channeled toward terror operations.
A separate study by blockchain forensics entity Chainalysis painted a different picture. It indicates a mere $450,000 of the said funds were directed to recognized terror-affiliated wallets. This finding significantly contrasts with the figures previously brandished.
In light of these revelations, WSJ amended its narrative. The outlet clarifies that the exchange between PIJ and Lebanon’s political entity Hezbollah might have amounted to $12 million in crypto. That figure is notably less than the initially claimed $93 million.
Setting the Record Straight
“Since 2021, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah may have transacted up to $12 million in cryptocurrency,” cites Elliptic, as per the corrected version of the article. The initial rendition erroneously suggested a transfer exceeding $12 million from PIJ to Hezbollah post-2021. That was rectified to align with Elliptic’s findings.
Further, WSJ amended the article to encapsulate “additional context” concerning Elliptic’s insights. The media team strives for a more accurate representation of the digital currency-terrorism nexus. Whether any mainstream media outlet will get it right is a different matter.
The amendment by WSJ followed a statement from Elliptic on October 25. They urged the publication to rectify the misinterpretation of crypto data. Elliptic emphasized the minuscule role of cryptocurrency in Hamas’s financing relative to other monetary channels.
Subsequently, on October 27, Elliptic expressed contentment over WSJ’s acknowledgment of the inaccuracies. Unfortunately, there is a lot of criticism toward these findings. Many believe the role of cryptocurrency in terrorism funding is far more outspoken than the initial WSJ portrayed.
@cryptomodedotcom GIVEAWAY TIME! 🎉 You can WIN a pass to the @Australian Crypto Convention 😁 Head over to our Twitter account! #giveaway2023✨ #giveawayaustralia #giveawaymelbourne #melbournegiveaway #auscryptocon ♬ Make It Better (Instrumental) – Anderson .Paak
Disclaimer
Please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. CryptoMode is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.
