A year into its transition to proof-of-stake (PoS), Ethereum showcases significant strides. Key among them: a 99.9% drop in energy consumption. Formerly reliant on the energy-intensive proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism, Ethereum has made monumental changes. This assertion is backed by data from The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Their figures confirm that Ethereum’s energy use plummeted from 21 terawatt hours under PoW.
Economic Implications: The Merge’s Effect
Post-merge, Ethereum isn’t just conserving energy. Its economic model has turned deflationary. Simply put, the newly minted Ether can’t keep pace with the rate at which ETH gets permanently removed. This observation is corroborated by ultrasound.money’s data. Their records show a reduction of over 300,000 ETH, equivalent to $488 million, since the Merge. Consequently, ETH’s total supply shrinks by 0.25% annually.
With this deflationary pressure, many anticipated Ethereum’s value to skyrocket. However, unexpected macroeconomic challenges, like the banking crisis and inflation spikes, played spoilsport. In a surprising twist, Bitcoin’s growth outstripped Ethereum’s in the year’s first quarter. This uptrend seemed fueled by the financial turbulence stemming from the banking crisis.
Replacing miners, stakers are now Ethereum’s network custodians. The subsequent Shapella upgrade in April 2023 further catalyzed this trend. Leading the charge in this domain are liquid staking providers like Lido and Rocket Pool. Post-Merge data from DefiLlama reveals a whopping $19.5 billion ETH entrusted to these liquid staking entities. Lido, claiming 72% of the staked ETH pie, reigns supreme.
Decentralization Concerns for Ethereum
Despite these advances, centralization apprehensions linger. Lido’s 32.26% control of the staked Ether, worth over $14 billion, intensifies these worries. The consensus is clear: Ethereum stands stronger with liquid staking. Yet, challenges abound.
Beyond staking, Ethereum grapples with client diversity concerns. Vitalik Buterin identified six pivotal issues to address Ethereum’s centralization. The crux? Most active 5,901 Ethereum nodes operate through giants like Amazon Web Services.
Experts argue this poses a singular point of vulnerability for the Ethereum blockchain. For enduring decentralization, Ethereum must empower individuals to run nodes. That translates to slashing both costs and hardware prerequisites.
An Ongoing Process To Thwart Centralization Threats
Buterin proposes a transformative remedy: statelessness. This innovative idea aims to reduce node operator data dependencies, almost nullifying the need for centralized servers.
Ethereum’s journey post its shift to proof-of-stake is marked by significant advances, evolving challenges, and a promise for a more sustainable and decentralized future.
None of the information on this website is investment or financial advice. CryptoMode is not responsible for any financial losses sustained by acting on information provided on this website.